Vendor profile
TrustLayer
LeadersUnclaimedModern COI tracking platform with carrier-direct verification and a sizable pre-existing vendor network.
TrustLayer positions itself as a modern, AI-assisted COI tracking platform with a multi-tier verification model — carrier-direct where partnerships exist (Nationwide is the publicized example), broker-network for participating brokers, and document-based for the rest. Reception is generally favorable on vendor experience and broker friendliness.
Are you TrustLayer? See something off? Submit our analyst questionnaire →
What it does well
Strengths
- Deep construction industry penetration including ENR 400 contractors, as both customers and vendor submitters. TrustLayer reports this concentration; its client list is not public and we have not independently verified it, though our broker conversations are consistent with it
- Carrier-direct verification partnership with Nationwide, announced December 2024 and confirmed by Nationwide's own newsroom — the only such partnership in this category we can verify from a primary source
- AI integrated into core verification workflow rather than bolted on
- Sizable pre-existing vendor network reduces onboarding friction for net-new buyers
- Submitter-side tooling observed under embargo (September 2026): compliance inbox, vendor marketplace, and AI that coaches a vendor through a failed requirement and what to request from their broker
- Broker-friendly architecture that aligns with rather than disintermediates broker relationships
- No formal certificate minimum — flexes for SMB through enterprise
Where it falls short
Weaknesses
- Carrier-direct tier only applies to vendors insured by integrated carriers; aggregate pitch can imply broader applicability than the underlying capability delivers
- Identity / MVR / credentialing not a focus — multi-domain compliance buyers should evaluate EvidentID
Buy it if you are
Best fit for
- Construction GCs, including ENR 400 firms — TrustLayer's deepest customer concentration
- Mid-market and enterprise risk teams without legacy attachment
- Programs where vendor onboarding speed matters
- Buyers prioritizing modern verification architecture and broker neutrality
- Mixed-vertical compliance programs
Look elsewhere if
Less ideal for
- Buyers with existing deep MyCOI or Veriforce integrations and no appetite for migration
- Multi-domain compliance buyers needing identity / MVR / credentialing in one system (evaluate EvidentID)
Pricing
Mostly not publicly published; generally flexible on contract structure across SMB through enterprise, with no formal certificate minimum we are aware of. The exception is TrustLayer Starter, a published free tier covering up to 50 vendors with expiration tracking, automated vendor notifications and AI document verification, then $10 per additional vendor per month (primary-source confirmed on trustlayer.io/pages/starter, September 2026). Note that Starter is free for the buyer tracking certificates, not for the vendors submitting them.
Integrations
- Procore (mature; launched May 2021)
- Expanded integration coverage shown to us under embargo, September 2026 — released to clients and design partners ahead of public announcement
- NetSuite, Sage, ERP via API
- Carrier-direct (Nationwide)
- Broker AMS network (selective)
- Slack, email workflows
From our research
Two capability claims came from a September 2026 vendor briefing, one of which moved a score. (1) Expanded integrations: we raised integrations from 7 to 8. TrustLayer releases to clients and design partners before announcing publicly, so there is no public citation; our analyst was briefed under embargo and observed the functionality working. Treat this as analyst-verified under NDA rather than primary-source confirmed. For context, the publicly documented set is Procore (launched May 2021), QuickBooks, Sage and Vista, and TrustLayer's own Groundbreak 2026 page announces no new capability. (2) Vendor experience: we raised this from 8 to 9, again on analyst observation under embargo rather than public sources. The substantiating capability is submitter-side — a compliance inbox, a vendor marketplace, and AI that tells a vendor which requirement their document failed and how to ask their broker for the right wording. Note that the briefing initially framed this claim around new free and low-cost tiers; TrustLayer Starter is confirmed but is free for the buyer, not the submitting vendor, so it is not the basis for this score. We held at 9 rather than 10 because bcs holds the category benchmark for submitter friction on no-login submission, and whether TrustLayer requires vendors to create a login remains unresolved — the sources asserting each answer are a competitor and a TrustLayer partner respectively. Resolving that would justify revisiting. TrustLayer is the platform that comes up most often in our broker conversations as one buyers can adopt without creating broker-side friction. Construction is the platform's bread-and-butter, and the submitter network reflects that. TrustLayer keeps its client list private, so the depth of its ENR 400 penetration is the company's own account rather than something we can confirm; treat it as vendor-reported. For comparison, Jones is the vendor with named ENR 400 references in public sources. TrustLayer is also a smaller company than its position on the presence axis might suggest: roughly 50 employees and no disclosed raise since 2021. Verify the share of your vendor base actually covered by the carrier-direct or pre-existing network during evaluation rather than relying on the aggregate figures the company markets.
Vendor response
TrustLayer has not claimed this profile or submitted a response. Everything above is our own assessment, drawn from public information, customer interviews and vendor research — none of it is TrustLayer's account of itself.
The right of reply stays open and costs nothing. A vendor can publish a statement in their own words alongside this assessment, correct anything factual, and answer our analyst questionnaire. What they cannot buy is a different assessment.
If you work at TrustLayer, start here →Head-to-head comparisons
TrustLayer vs. EvidentID: COI-Native Platform vs. Identity-First Verification
TrustLayer vs EvidentID compared on COI capabilities, identity verification, vendor experience, and platform fit. Honest comparison for risk managers.
TrustLayer vs. Certificial: Real-Time Claims, Real Verification, and What Actually Matters
TrustLayer vs Certificial compared on verification, real-time monitoring claims, data accuracy, and vendor experience. The honest comparison for risk managers.
TrustLayer vs. Jones: Modern Platform vs. Construction-Native Specialist
TrustLayer vs Jones compared on construction fit, CRE workflows, vendor experience, and the auto-outreach problem. Honest analysis for risk managers choosing between them.
TrustLayer vs. MyCOI: A 2026 Comparison for Risk Managers
TrustLayer vs MyCOI compared on verification depth, vendor experience, AI capabilities, and pricing. An honest breakdown for risk managers evaluating both.
In the essays
Why 'Real-Time COI Verification' Is Mostly Marketing Theater
Most 'real-time' COI platforms rely on AMS data that's only as fresh as the last time a broker updated it. Here's how to spot the difference between actual carrier-direct verification and dressed-up spreadsheet syncs.
What COI Tracking Will Look Like in 2030
Predictions for the COI tracking category over the next five years — what changes, what doesn't, and what to plan for.
Why Insurance Brokers Matter in Your COI Platform Choice
Your broker is a key stakeholder in COI tracking — but most platforms ignore the broker relationship. Here's why broker compatibility matters, and which platforms get it right.
The Quiet Death of myCOI: What Happened to a Category Pioneer
myCOI was an early pioneer in COI tracking software. Two decades later, the platform is showing its age — and the Illumend rebrand isn't fixing the underlying problems. Here's what's happening.
How to Run a COI Platform Demo So You Don't Get Sold Garbage
Sales demos are designed to make platforms look good. Here's how to structure your evaluation demos so you see what's actually under the hood — including the warts.
Implementation Horror Stories: How COI Software Rollouts Go Wrong
Implementation is where most COI software ROI gets lost. Real patterns from rollouts that failed, and how to avoid them.
The Certificial Problem: When 'Smart COI' Is Built on Dumb Data
Certificial markets itself as a real-time COI network. The reality: their data foundation depends on AMS systems with documented accuracy problems. Here's what risk managers need to know before signing.
International Vendor Compliance: When COIs Aren't COIs
Tracking compliance for international vendors is harder than domestic. Different document standards, different coverage structures, different verification challenges.